home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
The Supreme Court
/
The Supreme Court.iso
/
pc
/
wordperf
/
1993
/
order
/
011993a.zor
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-01-18
|
32KB
|
1,122 lines
ORDER LIST ORDER LIST
TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1993 TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1993
CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
92-217 AM. COUNCIL OF BLIND, ET AL. V. ROMER, GOV. OF CO, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for
further consideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, 506 ______ _____
U. S. (1992). ____
92-292 KOLODZIECZAK, RONALD, ET AL. V. FRIEND, JACK WAYNE, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
further consideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, 506 ______ _____
U. S. (1993). ____
92-402 NICHOLS, ROBERT, ET AL. V. ROMBERG, MICHAEL, ET UX.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
further consideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, 506 ______ _____
U. S. (1993). ____
1 ORDERS IN PENDING CASES ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
D-1188 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH A. LOMBARDI
It having been reported to the Court that Joseph A.
Lombardi, of Scituate, Massachusetts, has been disbarred
from the practice of law by the Supreme Judicial Court
of Massachusetts and this Court by order of October 19,
1992, having suspended the said Joseph A. Lombardi from
the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Joseph A. Lombardi be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1189 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL G. HURLEY
It having been reported to the Court that Daniel G.
Hurley, of Medford, Massachusetts, has been disbarred
from the practice of law by the Supreme Judicial Court
of Massachusetts and this Court by order of October 19,
1992, having suspended the said Daniel G. Hurley from
the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
be disbarred;
2
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Daniel G. Hurley be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1190 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD SY COLE
It having been reported to the Court that Howard Sy
Cole, of Van Nuys, California, has resigned from the
practice of law before the Supreme Court of California
and this Court by order of October 19, 1992, having
suspended the said Howard Sy Cole from the practice of
law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
requiring him to show cause why he should not be
disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly
issued;
It is ordered that the said Howard Sy Cole be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1191 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS J. SKRYD
It having been reported to the Court that Thomas J.
Skryd, of Cicero, Illinois, has been disbarred from the
practice of law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and
3
this Court by order of November 2, 1992, having
suspended the said Thomas J. Skryd from the practice of
law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
requiring him to show cause why he should not be
disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Thomas J. Skryd be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1192 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BENNETT ALBAN
It having been reported to the Court that Bennett
Alban, of Chicago, Illinois, has been disbarred from the
practice of law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and
this Court by order of November 2, 1992, having
suspended the said Bennett Alban from the practice of
law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
requiring him to show cause why he should not be
disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Bennett Alban be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
4
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1194 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WALTER HARRY CAPLAN
It having been reported to the Court that Walter
Harry Caplan, of San Francisco, California, has been
disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
of California and this Court by order of November 2,
1992, having suspended the said Walter Harry Caplan from
the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Walter Harry Caplan be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1195 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD J. CASPER
It having been reported to the Court that Howard J.
Casper, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has been
disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, and this Court by
order of November 2, 1992, having suspended the said
Howard J. Casper from the practice of law in this Court
and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
5
cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Howard J. Casper be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1196 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES IRVING HARLAN
It having been reported to the Court that James
Irving Harlan, of Dallas, Texas, has been suspended from
the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and
this Court by order of November 2, 1992, having
suspended the said James Irving Harlan from the practice
of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
requiring him to show cause why he should not be
disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said James Irving Harlan be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
6 D-1197 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF J. DARE HAWKINS
It having been reported to the Court that J. Dare
Hawkins, of Houston, Texas, has been disbarred from the
practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and this
Court by order of November 2, 1992, having suspended the
said J. Dare Hawkins from the practice of law in this
Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly
issued;
It is ordered that the said J. Dare Hawkins be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1198 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF IRA WATROUS
It having been reported to the Court that Ira
Watrous, of Houston, Texas, has been disbarred from the
practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and this
Court by order of November 2, 1992, having suspended the
said Ira Watrous from the practice of law in this Court
and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly
issued;
It is ordered that the said Ira Watrous be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
7 that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1200 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DENNIS J. SIMON
It having been reported to the Court that Dennis J.
Simon, of Coral Springs, Florida, has been disbarred
from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of
Maryland and this Court by order of November 2, 1992,
having suspended the said Dennis J. Simon from the
practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Dennis J. Simon be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1201 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF REGINALD L. NORRIS
It having been reported to the Court that Reginald
L. Norris, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, has been disbarred
from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
Michigan and this Court by order of November 9, 1992,
having suspended the said Reginald L. Norris from the
practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
8 disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly
issued;
It is ordered that the said Reginald L. Norris be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1207 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRED I. ZABRISKIE
It having been reported to the Court that Fred I.
Zabriskie, of Larchmont, New York, has resigned from the
practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme
Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and this
Court by order of November 16, 1992, having suspended the
said Fred I. Zabriskie from the practice of law in this
Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Fred I. Zabriskie be
disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1225 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES L. GLADSON
It is ordered that Charles L. Gladson, of
Washington, D. C., be suspended from the practice of law
9 in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1226 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS L. WADDELL
It is ordered that Thomas L. Waddell, of San Diego,
California, be suspended from the practice of law in
this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1227 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES W. ANSHEN
It is ordered that Charles W. Anshen, of Encino,
California, be suspended from the practice of law in
this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
111 ORIG. DELAWARE V. NEW YORK
The motion of New York for leave to file first amended
answers and leave to file counterclaim is denied without
prejudice to renewal following the issuance of the opinion
of this Court on the Report of the Special Master.
91-2054 U. S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE V. LANDANO, VINCENT
The motion of respondent to supplement the record
is granted.
92-207 UNITED STATES V. PADILLA, XAVIER, ET AL.
The motion of respondent Maria Simpson for leave to
proceed further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The _________________
10 motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is
ordered that David A. Bono, Esquire, of Washington, D.
C., is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondents
Donald Simpson, et al. in this case.
92-780 NOW, INC., ET AL. V. SCHEIDLER, JOSEPH, ET AL.
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief
in this case limited to Question 1 presented by the
petition for a writ of certiorari expressing the views
of the United States.
92-854 CENTRAL BANK OF DENVER V. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK, ET AL.
92-913 BANCO ESPANOL, ETC., ET AL. V. SECURITY PACIFIC, ET AL.
The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in
these cases expressing the views of the United States.
92-910 STOWE, MARY SUE DAVIS V. DAVIS, JUNIOR, ET AL.
The motion of petitioner to expedite consideration
of the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
92-6027 SMITH, CARLTON V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GEN.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in ___
_
forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until ______________________________
February 9, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee
required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens, dissenting: For
the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 _____ _______________
U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for a writ
of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion
11 to proceed in forma pauperis. _________________
92-6449 DAVIS, DOROTHY L. V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in ___
_
forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until ______________________________
February 9, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee
required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expressed
in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I _____ _______________
would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without
reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma _________
_
pauperis. __________________________
CERTIORARI DENIED CERTIORARI DENIED
91-1794 WALKER, ANN V. ANDERSON ELECTRICAL
92-612 MACKIN, LAWRENCE, ET AL. V. BOSTON, ET AL.
92-663 BD. OF TRUSTEES KNOX COUNTY V. SULLIVAN, SEC. H&HS
92-699 FISHER, DANNY V. UNITED STATES
92-706 YAMAHA CORP. OF AM. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
92-707 DUFFY, PETER, ET AL. V. FDIC, ET AL.
92-717 SISSLER, JOSEPH EMILE V. UNITED STATES
92-751 SNOHOMISH CTY., ET AL. V. LUTHERAN DAY CARE
92-752 VARAH, A. V. UNITED STATES
92-755 FIRST NATL. LIFE INS. V. SUNSHINE-JR. FOOD STORES
92-796 ODOM, WILLIAM V. LEWIS, GEORGE T., ET AL.
12 92-816 D.R., ET AL. V. MIDDLE BUCKS TECH., ET AL.
92-841 EL MONTE, CA V. RHODES, OTHA T.
92-850 TEAGUE, JOSEPH, ET AL. V. EMPLOYERS REINS. ET AL.
92-853 SANDERS CONFECTION., ET AL. V. HELLER FINANCIAL, ET AL.
92-857 DILLARD, CARVEL V. SECURITY PACIFIC, ET AL.
92-858 McLEOD, WILLIAM V. McLEOD, FUMIKO I.
92-861 RIDER, ROBIN V. ALABAMA
92-862 SMITH, EDWARD V. DEPT. OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEV.
92-863 FRITO-LAY, INC., ET AL. V. WAITS, TOM
92-865 O'BRIEN, CHARLES W. V. BANK ONE, COLUMBUS, N.A.
92-866 O'BRIEN, CHARLES W. V. BANK ONE, COLUMBUS, N.A.
92-873 ) ALLSTATE INS. CO. V. MALESKI, ACT. INS. COMMR. OF PA
)
92-937 ) RHINE REINS. CO., ET AL. V. MUTUAL FIRE, MARINE, ET AL.
92-874 SIEMER, WENCHE, ET AL. V. LEARJET ACQUISITION CORP.
92-875 HONEYCUTT, DIANE, ET AL. V. NORBECK, TRUSTEE, ET AL.
92-876 MACIARIELLO, ROBERT, ET AL. V. LANCASTER, ET AL.
92-878 AMERINET, INC., ET AL. V. XEROX CORP.
92-880 MIDBOE, KAI V. CHEM. WASTE MGMT., INC.
92-881 MAXA, JAMES V. JOHN ALDEN LIFE INS. CO.
92-882 ELUL REALTY CORP. V. GREYHOUND EXHIBITGROUP, INC.
92-884 MOORE, MONICA V. GWINNETT CTY., ET AL.
92-885 ROBERTS, JAY, ETC., ET AL. V. MUTSKO, JOHN, ET AL.
92-886 AZUL PACIFICO, INC. V. LOS ANGELES, CA
92-887 BERGER, SANFORD, ET AL. V. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSN.
92-890 GUINN, LESLIE V. TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIV., ET AL.
92-894 TINSLEY, LARRY V. KUHLMANN, WARDEN
13 92-898 JATOI, ALIMADAD, ET UX. V. AETNA INSURANCE CO., ET AL.
92-899 SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL. V. STONE, WILL, ET AL.
92-904 McCOY, CHARLES, ET AL. V. SEAWARD MARINE SERV., INC.
92-905 MAYFLOWER INTL., ET AL. V. PAUAHI ASSOCIATES
92-923 GALLAGHER, STEPHEN, ET AL. V. IN ST. ELECTION BD., ET AL.
92-930 QUIGLEY, ROBERT V. FLORIDA
92-953 COLEMAN, JOANNE V. NATIONWIDE LIFE INS. CO.
92-962 POLYAK, EARLENE V. CIR
92-975 GIBSON, THELMA V. SULLIVAN, SEC. H&HS
92-976 LYNCH, JOHN THOMAS V. UNITED STATES
92-979 NAKELL, BARRY, ET AL. V. BRITT, JOE, ET AL.
92-986 BUCK, PITMAN, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
92-987 BASHA, ROBERT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
92-1020 DOWDY, GILBERT V. UNITED STATES
92-5822 HOLLAND, DANIEL V. McGINNIS, WARDEN, ET AL.
92-5897 JOHNSON, WALLACE V. UNITED STATES
92-5925 FELDMAN, ROBERT I. V. UNITED STATES
92-5950 JOHNSON, HERBERT V. UNITED STATES
92-5954 ) HILL, LEON V. UNITED STATES
)
92-6182 ) AMUNDSEN, EVA L. V. UNITED STATES
)
92-6386 ) HILL, WAYNE G. V. UNITED STATES
)
92-6532 ) AMUNDSEN, HYRUM J. V. UNITED STATES
92-6001 SMITH, STEVEN V. OPM
92-6007 EASLEY, IKE J. V. ILLINOIS
92-6044 GANUS, VICTOR L. V. ILLINOIS
92-6062 COFFELT, HERSCHEL L. V. UNITED STATES
14 92-6095 HILL, ARTHUR V. UNITED STATES
92-6111 GENTRY, KENNETH V. TEXAS
92-6132 DRISCOLL, RONALD V. UNITED STATES
92-6187 KLEINSCHMIDT, WILLIAM E. V. U.S. FIDELITY, ET AL.
92-6236 SKIDMORE, ROCKY DANIEL V. UNITED STATES
92-6256 McFARLAND, WALLACE V. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP., ET AL.
92-6274 LEE, KYE SOO V. UNITED STATES
92-6335 CAULEY, JOHN WILLIE V. UNITED STATES
92-6343 WILLMSCHEN, GLENN E. V. UNITED STATES
92-6347 MARTINEZ, JOHN V. V. UNITED STATES
92-6371 OBI, HARRY NDUBISI V. UNITED STATES
92-6392 BARSKI, STANLEY FRANK V. UNITED STATES
92-6415 ROZO, RUBEN V. UNITED STATES
92-6464 BERKOWITZ, MARVIN V. UNITED STATES
92-6534 MARTIN, KEITH V. UNITED STATES
92-6603 ATWOOD, FRANK JARVIS V. ARIZONA
92-6636 YOUNGS, BARBARA S. V. TEXAS DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS
92-6648 FARRELL, CHARLES V. McDONOUGH, LAWRENCE
92-6654 YORDAN, LUIS V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
92-6656 BALLARD, JAMES A. V. PASKETT, WARDEN, ET AL.
92-6662 SUDARSKY, PETER V. NEW YORK CITY, ET AL.
92-6671 MEYERS, JANINA LOUISE V. CALIFORNIA
92-6675 ROBERTS, JOAN V. WEST. MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, ET AL.
92-6677 WIGLEY, TROY EUGENE V. ALFRED HUGHES UNIT, ET AL.
92-6680 BRUNS, KEITH WAYNE V. THALACKER, WARDEN
92-6682 BROWN, LARRY V. KELLY, SUPT., ATTICA
15 92-6691 BARKSDALE-CONTRERAS, TOMAS V. UNITED STATES
92-6695 WHITEHEAD, DAVID V. JENIFER, FRANKLYN
92-6696 TAYLOR, JOSEPH V. CITY OF NEW ALBANY, ET AL.
92-6707 BROKENBROUGH, JOHN H. V. REDMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
92-6708 WARD, JAMES RAY V. GEORGIA
92-6712 JONES, RICKY L. V. WRIGHT, WARDEN
92-6713 HAYS, LEE M. V. IDAHO
92-6717 DIGGS, DEMETRIUS V. UNITED STATES
92-6731 HUFF, OSCAR V. WILCOX COUNTY ADMINR., ET AL.
92-6734 WIGLEY, TROY EUGENE V. SMITH, AUDREY L., ET AL.
92-6736 CROCKETT, DONALD C. V. DUTTON, WARDEN
92-6740 CURIALE, JOSEPH, ET UX. V. HICKEL, GOV. OF AK, ET AL.
92-6751 COUSINO, PAUL W. V. REKUCKI, LORALEE, ET AL.
92-6757 MANN, LARRY EUGENE V. FLORIDA
92-6771 MARTINEZ, PETER PAUL V. COLORADO
92-6815 SASSER, HIRAM STANLEY V. UNITED STATES
92-6837 BRECHEEN, ROBERT A. V. OKLAHOMA
92-6847 BUCHANAN, HOSIE J. V. UNITED STATES
92-6850 ARMSTRONG, HUCKLEY V. UNITED STATES
92-6853 SIERS, DARWIN V. UNITED STATES
92-6854 DANIELS, JAMES V. UNITED STATES
92-6877 CLARKE, BARRINGTON V. UNITED STATES
92-6880 CAGE, FOLEY LAWRENCE V. UNITED STATES
92-6888 PLEASANT, EDDIE LOUIS V. UNITED STATES
92-6890 BEGLEN, WILLIAM V. UNTIED STATES
92-6894 HOOKER, ALGERNON A. V. UNITED STATES
16 92-6895 KIMMONS, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
92-6899 COLEMAN, TROY T. V. UNITED STATES
92-6945 CARDINE, STANLEY MOSE V. KENTUCKY
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
92-597 1975 SALARIED RETIRE., ET AL. V. NOBERS, DAVID, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.
92-728 TWIN CITY FIRE INS., ET AL. V. FORTUNATO, SAMUEL, ETC.
The motion of Connecticut Business & Industry
Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae _____________
is granted. The motion of Institute for Justice, et al.
for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. ____________
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
92-868 REPUBLIC INS. GROUP, ET AL. V. MALESKI, ACT. INS. COMMR. PA
The motion of Reinsurance Association of America
for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. _____________
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
92-908 CAPLINGER, MIKE, ET AL. V. DOE, JANE
The motion of National School Boards Assn., et al.
for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. ____________
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
92-951 GOINS, N. WALTER V. LANG, DALE, ET AL.
The motion of respondents Syndicated
Communications, Inc., et al. for award of double costs
and attorneys' fees is denied. The petition for a writ
of certiorari is denied.
17 92-1008 SUPPLE, JEROME, ET AL. V. HAYS CTY. GUARDIAN, ET AL.
The motion of American Council on Education for
leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The _____________
petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
92-6287 HIRSCHFELD, RICHARD M. V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioner to strike brief in
opposition is denied. The application for bail addressed
to Justice Thomas and referred to the Court is denied.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
HABEAS CORPUS DENIED HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
92-6957 IN RE PARIS VALENTINE
92-7026 IN RE JACK E. FLEMING
The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are
denied.
MANDAMUS DENIED MANDAMUS DENIED
92-6681 IN RE JULES SMITH
92-6694 IN RE GLENN SPRADLEY
92-6716 IN RE FREDERICK W. BAUER
92-6816 IN RE EDWARD STARLING
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
18
REHEARINGS DENIED REHEARINGS DENIED
91-719 PARKE, WARDEN V. RALEY, RICKY
91-6646 HADLEY, VERL V. UNITED STATES
91-8060 ABELLO-SILVA, JOSE R. V. UNITED STATES
92-5642 IN RE FREDERICK W. BAUER
92-5857 FLANAGAN, JOHN W. V. UNITED STATES
92-5974 VEGA, MARTIN S. V. TEXAS
92-5997 ZIEBARTH, SYLVESTER V. FARM CREDIT BANK OF ST. PAUL
92-6179 IN RE HENRY SANDERS
The petitions for rehearing are denied.
RECESS ORDER RECESS ORDER
The Court will take a recess from Monday, January
25, 1993 until Monday, February 22, 1993.
MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
The written motions for admission of the following
lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
19
